Logitech is facing a proposed class action that seeks to force the company to pass tariff refund proceeds to customers, according to Ars Technica and Tom’s Hardware. The complaint argues that Logitech raised prices to offset import tariffs that the US Supreme Court later ruled were unlawful, then retained both the higher customer payments and a government refund tied to those tariffs. Ars Technica reports that SJK Development, a construction and residential housing builder in California, and California resident Ala Awadalla filed the complaint in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, on Tuesday. The complaint says both plaintiffs bought Logitech mice at higher prices and received no refund, credit, or other compensation for the tariff component allegedly embedded in those prices. The pricing facts are central to the case. Ars reports that in April 2025 Logitech raised prices on 51% of its portfolio, with some increases reaching 25%. Tom’s Hardware similarly reports that the company increased prices on more than half of its product line by as much as 25%, and says the increases remain in place. The lawsuit ties those price actions to tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Ars reports that the Supreme Court ruled in February that President Donald Trump imposed the IEEPA tariffs illegally, and that the refund process is ongoing. The complaint’s theory is that Logitech justified higher prices to cover tariff costs, but should not keep the proceeds once those tariff costs were refunded. Both outlets report that the complaint alleges Logitech received a full $61 million refund for tariffs invalidated by the Supreme Court. Ars describes the complaint as saying Logitech received $15 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2027 and $46 million after quarter end; Tom’s Hardware says the lawsuit alleges a full $61 million refund as of June 30, 2026. The total matches, but the timing is not described identically across the two reports. Tom’s Hardware adds that the complaint alleges Logitech extracted approximately $73 million to $97 million from consumers in fiscal 2026 through tariff-justified price increases, and estimates the amount passed through to the proposed class at at least $75 million to $100 million. Those figures are allegations from the lawsuit, not findings by a court. The complaint also points to Logitech’s investor communications. Ars reports that Logitech executives told investors the company’s US price actions helped offset tariff costs, including comments from Chief Financial Officer Matteo Anversa on a May call saying US price actions and foreign exchange more than offset tariffs and higher promotions. Tom’s Hardware cites a company statement from a May 2026 earnings call saying manufacturing diversification and US price increases more than offset the negative impact of tariffs. Logitech is not the only consumer tech company facing this type of claim. Ars reports that customers have also sued Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony over tariff refunds. Tom’s Hardware discusses a similar Nintendo dispute, noting that Nintendo has argued customers received the products they agreed to buy at agreed prices. The provided reports do not include a Logitech response to the new complaint. Who benefits: If the plaintiffs prevail, affected Logitech buyers could receive refunds or credits tied to tariff-related price increases. Plaintiffs’ lawyers may also gain a template for similar consumer tech refund claims. Who's exposed: Logitech is directly exposed to the proposed class action and to discovery around pricing, tariff recovery, and investor statements. Ars reports that Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony are also facing customer lawsuits over tariff refunds, though each case will turn on its own facts.